The Wrong Messages


Genesis 9:7  “And you, be ye fruitful, and multiply; bring forth abundantly in the earth, and multiply therein.”

And we did.   But the problem is, the bible so many Christians look to for wisdom, doesn’t tell us when to STOP.

It took 4 million years for humanity to reach

the 2 billion mark. 

Only 30 years to add a third billion

And now we’re increasing by about 90 million every single year.  

 

ScienceDaily (Apr. 18, 2009) — “Overpopulation is the only problem,” said Dr. Charles A. Hall, a systems ecologist. “If we had 100 million people on Earth — or better, 10 million — no others would be a problem.” (Current estimates put the planet’s population at more than six billion.)

Dr. Allan P. Drew, a forest ecologist, put it this way: “Overpopulation means that we are putting more carbon dioxide into the atmosphere than we should, just because more people are doing it and this is related to overconsumption by people in general, especially in the ‘developed’ world.”

“But, whether developed or developing,” said Dr. Susan Senecah, who teaches the history of the American environmental movement, “everyone is encouraged to ‘want’ and perceive that they ‘need’ to consume beyond the planet’s ability to provide.”

Heather Horn918 Views Mar 15, 2010

“Many of today’s most-respected thinkers, from Stephen Hawking to David Attenborough, argue that our efforts to fight climate change and other environmental perils will all fail unless we ‘do something’ about population growth.” This, says Fred Pearce frankly, “is nonsense.” Far from surging out of control, population growth is actually slowing, he says. Writing in the British magazine Prospect, Pearce argues that the Western preoccupation with the overpopulation issue isn’t just silly, it’s hypocritical: In fact, rising consumption today far outstrips the rising headcount as a threat to the planet. And most of the extra consumption has been in rich countries that have long since given up adding substantial numbers to their population, while most of the remaining population growth is in countries with a very small impact on the planet. By almost any measure you choose, a small proportion of the world’s people take the majority of the world’s resources and produce the majority of its pollution.”
 
 
So which is it?  The worst problem of our modern day, or a silly fear we shouldn’t worry about?
 
In China they have restricted the number of children any given family may have to one.   In America we squabble over whether women should still have say over what happens to their bodies, or should we make them into breeding stock?  And in fact it seems lately the GOP is trying every imaginable thing to rob women of the dignity and freedom our recent suffrage pilgrims fought so hard for.  Are we stopping them?  Are we employing our reason that tells us women are human beings and not property and neither are fetuses within a woman’s body a man’s property or the government’s property?  Why is it that flagrant disregard for common sense is rearing its prehistoric bigoted head all across America–in Alaska, Wisconsin and Arizona, to name a few places?  Why are women voting to oppress their own gender–working to sabatage the free will and the progress (finally) of other members of their sex?
 
All in the name of what, exactly?  Pro-LIFE?   Is it pro-life, the images we see of starving children–families, all around the world and right here in the US?   Is it pro-life, seeing starving polar bears, entire pods of whales or dolphins beaching themselves, dead fish filling up harbors, shooting wolves and bears from airplanes, destroying the wild habitats to make room for more farmland to feed all of us?  What about pro-future?  For us?  For our planet?  In the struggle between pro-choice (which can also be pro-life, by the way) and “pro-life,” where does our chance of having a future lie?
 
I am pro-life.  I am also pro-choice.  I believe humans are by nature short-sighted and selfish creatures, and due to religion and other influences, many families will continue wanting large families no matter how densely populated our earth becomes.  I believe birth control and abortion will not only one day be encouraged, but enforced, just as it is in China.  And why do I believe this?  Because one of these years someone is going to realize that we are in the process of destroying our chances of seeing our own future, or any kind of bright future.  We are, in this obscene effort to oppress women in the name of preserving unformed fetuses, not acting in the interest of pro-life, but pro-extinction.
 
Leaders with 1930’s mind sets  have crawled recently from the tar pits where they belong to try to again enforce patriarchal and arcane ideals upon a society already teetering on the very of reverting to tribalism.  These “leaders” like Alan Dick in Alaska, or Ann Coulter–fundamental Christians with their righteous indignation and holy ethics (that I’m sorry, are not taken from the Christian bible, but from from their own narrow minded and bigoted interpretation of what the world should be),  need to be dealt with accordingly, not encouraged, not enabled, but banished from places of power, where all they can do is poison our planet, our society, and rob us of our fragile hopes for any kind of future. 
Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s